![Phân tích tư tưởng của nhân dân qua đoạn thơ: Những người vợ nhớ chồng… Những cuộc đời đã hóa sông núi ta trong Đất nước của Nguyễn Khoa Điềm](https://thuvienso.net/upload/document/136415/phan-tich-tu-tuong-cua-nhan-dan-qua-doan-tho-039-039-nhung-nguoi-vo-nho-chong-nhung-cuoc-doi-da-hoa-song-nui-ta-039-039-trong-dat-nuoc-cua-nguyen-khoa-136415.jpg)
“Parody” in Nguyen Huy Thiep’s short stories
Thông tin tài liệu:
Nội dung trích xuất từ tài liệu:
“Parody” in Nguyen Huy Thiep’s short stories JOURNAL OF SCIENCE OF HNUE Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 61-68 “PARODY” IN NGUYEN HUY THIEP’S SHORT STORIES Le Huy Bac Hanoi Nationnal University of Education E-mail: lehuybac@gmail.com Abstract. Parody in Nguyen Huy Thiep’s short stories is quite diverse. He has managed to create his own signature style in the field. His parody is only vaguely related to comedy and if it is funny, it is bitter fun. Parody by Thiep is the basis of his philosophical view of life. Parody in literature has contributed positively and uniquely to the ups and downs of human existence. It can partly answer the question of why Nguyen Huy Thiep’s characters so often speak bitterly of life and yet his works ooze sympathy and positivity in life. Keyworld: parody, short stories, philosophical view.1. Introduction “The sky is blue. In the sky comes a white cloud looking like a sage. Suddenly,blown by the wind, the sage transforms into a giant hairy dog.” [2;316] It is certain that when writing these lines, Nguyen Huy Thiep did not intendto express a talent for parody. However, comparisons have been made and he isrecognized for his art of parody.2. Content Parody in Nguyen Huy Thiep’s short stories is diverse. He has managed increating his own signature style in the field. His parody is only vaguely related tocomedy and if it is funny, it is bitter fun. “You lured Bieng into a game for fun anddefeated him for real. Your way of wrestling is the way of an intellectual. It can onlyfool Quy, not me.” I laughed. “Have you heard the saying, ‘The revolutionary only concentrateson the ultimate goal’ ?” “Don’t lure me into the politics of ideology, you scoundrel,” Buong said. “You know Buong,” I said. “He is so strong. If he broke my arm, would youfeel sorry for me?” 61 Le Huy Bac “You are by nature a politically intellectual roughneck. How disgusting. Getthe fuck out of here.” Buong spat in my face” [1;333]. No satiety can be found in the fun due to the direct cruel comments in thedialogue of the two characters. This is Nguyen Huy Thiep’s style of parody. In worksby experts of parody like Cervantes and Voltaire, one sees no direct comments on theparodied subject. They focus only on their characters’ use of language and objectiveactions in their immanent logic. Nguyen Huy Thiep purposefully lets his charactersdirectly discuss and comment on the parodied subject. It takes away the surpriseof the parody and minimizes the metaphor of the subject. Nevertheless, thanksto the straightforward description, readers can pick up on the interesting, parodiedthinking. Buong, the professional sawyer, is honest while Ngoc, the unwilling sawyer,who fails his university graduation exam, is deceitful, does not obey the code ofconduct and cheats to win. Buong despises that action and the victory gained aswell. In addition, Nguyen Huy Thiep parodies the ludicrous press. Phong, one ofthe newspaper’s owners whose caricature with horns was printed by the staff, asked,“Is there any truth to the allusion in the cartoon?” The editor said, “I’ve heard a rumor that when you were in Ke Noi, yourson-in-law Dien and your wife Thieu Hoa were very intimate.” Phong laughed hollowly, “Thank you, sir,” He said. “Please carry on with yourwork. Just remember next time to keep the interest of the owner at heart. If youcan’t remember this simple rule, then you shouldn’t be in journalism.” The editor looked confused, “But I thought a jounalist should work in theinterest of freedom, equality and fraternity,” he said. “I see that you have a good sense of humour,” said Phong, “Now get out of mysight before I get angry or you’ll soon be eating shit” [1;175]. This detail not only expresses the nature of the press professional (always withorientation), it also causes the reader to pity both the owner and the reporter. Theyare both victims of what is bad in society. It is easy to see that Nguyen Huy Thiepparodied details are drawn from both his previous works and from life. Therefore,his parodied works not only use prior images or ideas in literature, but also thosein contemporary life. However, in order to be the parodied subject, they should beacknowledged by readers as a particular cultural expression. In this principle, Nguyen Huy Thiep’s short stories also parody the actions ofthe lovebird knight Don Quixote created by Cervantes. When Ngoc, the narrator“I” in The Woodcutters, prevents Buong from raping Quy, Buong challenges Ngocto a fight: “How about that? Move forward! Offer your victory at the feet of MissDulcinea in the village of Toledo” [1;341]. The challenge of the unethical person62 “Parody” in Nguyen Huy Thiep’s short storiesironically turns the future bachelor, the symbol of morality, into a dull-head whofights with the windmill because perhaps Quy herself wants to be raped. This wayof thinking is expressed by the author in the dialogue of the two characters after afierce fight. “You are so mean and cruel,” I said. Buong sneered, “My litle boy, isn’t Jesus Christ mean and cruel? Isn’t Buddhamean and cruel?” “The nobility of human beings seem to lie in ther limits,” I said. “That’s right,” Buong said. “Didn’t you see what happened when Quy had herclothes stripped off?” he asked. “The way she closed her thighs – she was absolutelynoble in her spirit” [1,342]. In this story, Buong is built on the model of Vautrin by Balzac, an experiencedperson who struggles to earn a living and deeply under ...
Tìm kiếm theo từ khóa liên quan:
Short stories Philosophical view Nguyen Huy Thiep’s short stories Văn học Việt Nam Truyện ngắn Nguyễn Huy ThiếpTài liệu có liên quan:
-
Giáo trình Văn học Việt Nam hiện đại (Từ sau cách mạng tháng Tám 1945): Phần 1 (Tập 2)
79 trang 399 12 0 -
Giáo trình Văn học Việt Nam giai đoạn 1945-1975: Phần 1 - Trường ĐH Thủ Dầu Một
142 trang 363 8 0 -
Oan và giải oan trong truyện Nghiệp oan của Đào Thị của Nguyễn Dữ
6 trang 304 0 0 -
Luận án tiến sĩ Ngữ văn: Dấu ấn tư duy đồng dao trong thơ thiếu nhi Việt Nam từ 1945 đến nay
193 trang 242 0 0 -
Khóa luận tốt nghiệp Văn học: Nghệ thuật xây dựng nhân vật trong truyện ngắn Nguyễn Huy Thiệp
64 trang 210 0 0 -
91 trang 184 0 0
-
Chi tiết 'cái chết' trong tác phẩm của Nam Cao
9 trang 174 0 0 -
Khóa luận tốt nghiệp: Sự ảnh hưởng của tư tưởng Nho giáo trong Hồng Đức Quốc âm thi tập
67 trang 159 0 0 -
Giáo trình Văn học Việt Nam hiện đại (Từ đầu thế kỉ XX đến 1945): Phần 2 (Tập 1)
94 trang 153 6 0 -
Luận văn tốt nghiệp đại học ngành Ngữ văn: Đặc điểm truyện thơ Lục Vân Tiên của Nguyễn Đình Chiểu
85 trang 137 0 0 -
Báo cáo khoa học: Bước đầu hiện đại hóa chữ quốc ngữ qua một số truyện ngắn Nam Bộ đầu thế kỷ 20
5 trang 130 0 0 -
Luận văn Thạc sĩ Văn học: Truyện ngắn Nguyễn Quang Thiều dưới góc nhìn trần thuật học
93 trang 126 0 0 -
Văn học bằng ngôn ngữ học-Thử xét văn hoá: Phần 2
149 trang 125 0 0 -
totto-chan bên cửa sổ: phần 2 - nxb văn học
54 trang 114 0 0 -
Tập truyện Bông trái quê nhà: Phần 1
66 trang 112 0 0 -
Truyền thống văn hóa & phương pháp xây dựng văn hóa dân tộc: Phần 1
88 trang 111 0 0 -
112 trang 110 0 0
-
Những khả năng và thách thức nghiên cứu văn học Việt Nam
37 trang 109 0 0 -
229 trang 105 0 0
-
Giáo trình Văn học Việt Nam hiện đại (Từ sau cách mạng tháng Tám 1945): Phần 2 (Tập 2)
78 trang 96 4 0